Davy's Executors v. Faw
Supreme Court of the United States
.THIS case seems to be sufficiently stated in the following opinion, delivered by Makshah, Chi J. on the, 9th of. March.,..All the Judges being present. This jé an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the county of Alexandria, sitting in Chancery, by Which that; Court, set aside an award made between the parties, and directed an account The hill impeaches the award, because, l. The arbiters exceeded theirpower;. a.
Read the full summary
.THIS case seems to be sufficiently stated in the following opinion, delivered by Makshah, Chi J. on the, 9th of. March.,..All the Judges being present. This jé an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the county of Alexandria, sitting in Chancery, by Which that; Court, set aside an award made between the parties, and directed an account The hill impeaches the award, because, l. The arbiters exceeded theirpower;. a. They made no aW:&rd with respect to a- part1 of mutter submitted tó'thejn. 3- They .were partial, and proceeded to make their award without hearing the party against whom…
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Ch. J.
That is where the title is in question. Rut here the title was conveyed — the dispute'was only &s “to the price. The question of title was not submitted;
Livingston, J. — -Although that point was. not made in the argument, yet it was considered by the Court.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Davy's Executors v. FawSupreme Court of the United States · 1812