Legal Opinion

Peerless Insurance v. Boyle

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On February 3, 1984, Boyle was injured in an accident caused by an underinsured motorist. He was eventually diagnosed with postconcussion syndrome. He recovered $10,000, the policy limit, from the tortfeasor’s insurer.

On January 19, 1990, Boyle filed with the American Arbitration Association a demand for arbitration regarding underinsured motorist benefits under a policy with Metropolitan Insurance Co. Subsequently, Boyle learned that his policy with Peerless also provided underinsured motorist benefits. Boyle then added Peerless to his demand for arbitration. The amended demand was forwarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. Sonus Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Mailman's Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp. v. LizotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Brockton Credit Union v. Brockton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arequipeno v. HallMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API