Legal Opinion
CELISTICS, LLC v. Gonzalez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 25, 2009No. 3D09-874PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.
The defendant, Celistics, LLC (“Celis-tics”), appeals from a non-final order denying its motion to dismiss, based on the trial court’s finding that the forum selection clause in the Service Agreement (“Agreement”), which the parties are allegedly subject to, is permissive, not mandatory. Because we conclude that the forum selection clause is mandatory, we reverse the order under review and remand for entry of an order granting Celistics’ motion to dismiss.
The plaintiff, Juan Manuel Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”), an Argentinean national, filed a complaint against Celistics, which is headquartered in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Granados Quinones v. Swiss Bank Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Bombardier Capital Inc. v. Progressive Marketing Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- GOLF SCORING SYSTEMS UNLIMITED v. RemedioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- World Vacation Travel v. BrookerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. STEARNS BANK NATL. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Espresso Disposition Corp. 1 v. Santana Sales & Marketing Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Michaluk v. Credorax (USA), Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- American K-9 Detection Services, Inc. v. CiceroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- American Safety Casualty Insurance v. Mijares Holding Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Antoniazzi v. WardakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.