Legal Opinion
Maxmed Healthcare, Inc. v. Burwell
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided January 20, 2016No. SA:14-CV-988-DAEPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
David Alan Ezra, Senior United States Distict Judge
Before the Court are (1) Plaintiff Max-med Healthcare, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Maxmed”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 21); and (2) Defendant Sylvia Mathews Bunyell, Secretary, Health and Human Service’s (“Defendant” or “HHS”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 25). Pursuant to Local Rule 7(h), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing.
After careful consideration of the memo-randa in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carol A. HOLLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hospice of East Texas v. Secretary, US Department of Health of Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2025
- O'Neill v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019