Legal Opinion

Bank of Northern Liberties v. Munford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the District Court of Philadelphia. Execution attachment.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

by Thompson, J.

--The defendants in error and below have a judgment against the firm of Reed & Neely. It having been confessed by Neely alone, an application was made by Reed to the District Court, to set aside the judgment <as to him individually, which, on hearingj the court did, leaving it in full force and effect against the firm of Reed & Neely. On this judgment the plaintiff issued an execution attachment, and attached moneys of the firm on deposit in the Bank of Northern Liberties, and summoned the officers of the bank as garnishees. In answer to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. Bender (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Shaffer v. Hebenstreit (Et. Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Schwartz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API