Legal Opinion

Mido v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 10, 2021No. 8:19-cv-01037Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JEMIMA MIDO, * Plaintiff, * Case No. TJS-19-1037 v. * WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA * TRANSIT AUTHORITY, * Defendant. * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (ECF No. 25).1 Having considered the submissions of the parties (ECF Nos. 25, 26, 27, 34, 35 & 36), I find that a hearing is unnecessary. Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, the Motion will be denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jemima Mido…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Iko v. ShreveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API