West v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion alleging that his consecutive sentences violate Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), we affirm.
The appellant was convicted of four counts of burglary, four counts of grand theft, one count of possession of burglary tools, and one count of aggravated fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer. The appellant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender to ten years’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Fotopoulos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Bundy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Fenelon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Smithers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CALEB SEMENTELLI v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018