Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

United States v. Project on Government Oversight

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 3, 2010No. 08-5182, 08-5465, 08-5466Published

1Concurring in the judgmentEdwards, Senior Circuit Judge

I concur in the judgment reached by the majority. I also concur in much of the analysis supporting majority opinion. However, I cannot concur in the majority’s disposition of the Government’s cross-appeal challenging the District Court’s construction of 18 U.S.C. § 216(b). I agree that the Government loses on the merits, but I think the issue is much closer than is suggested by the majority opinion.

As the majority opinion properly notes, our review of § 216(b) is de novo, so we owe no deference to the District Court’s construction of the disputed penalty provision. It is unclear whether the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Project on Gov't OversightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API