Legal Opinion

Walberg v. Smyth

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 22, 1956No. Civ. 31004, 31005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.

This is a suit for the refund of taxes paid under protest by plaintiffs, Richard Walberg and his wife Mary Ruth Walberg. Jurisdiction is sounded on 28 U.S. C. § 1340. Plaintiffs attributed portions of the business income of the construction firm of Swinerton & Walberg for the years 1946 and 1947 to a trust for plaintiffs’ minor son; this trust was treated as a limited partner in the construction firm. Defendant, formerly a Collector of Internal Revenue, reallocated the trust income to plaintiffs, contending that the income was actually earned by plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Lusthaus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Sam Snyder v. Harry C. Westover, Former Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. Thomas P. Pike and Katherine Keho Pike v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tiberti v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  2. Broide v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API