Rice v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, Presiding Judge.
We have set out the evidence in detail. Counsel for the defendant contend that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. When we consider the evidence of all the witnesses for the State we find that it is entirely sufficient to sustain the, verdict, and the motion for a new trial as to the general grounds is not meritorious.
In the first special ground complaint is made that the testimony of Mrs. Athlee Crosby was erroneously admitted. We will discuss her testimony with the view of determining whether or not it is admissible as set out in this special…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Harper v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Holder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959