Legal Opinion
King v. Village of Tully
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 28, 1939Published
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We think the verdict directed by the court finds support in the evidence and is not against its weight and there being no errors of law on the trial the judgment should be affirmed. (Danaher v. City of Brooklyn, 119 N. Y. 241, 254, 255; Tagg v. City of Lockport, 228 App. Div. 319, 320; affd., 254 N. Y. 582; Gubasko v. City of New York, 12 Daly, 183; affd., 1 N. Y. Supp. 215, 217; Murphy v. City of Lockport, 257 App. Div. 920; Lahart v. City of New York, 246 N. Y. 643.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Danaher v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Tagg v. City of LockportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Tagg v. City of LockportNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Gubasko v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1888
- Gubasko v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.