Legal Opinion

City of Gaffney v. Putnam

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 1941No. 15271PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Associate Justice Fishburne.

The Circuit Court upon appeal upheld the judgment of conviction of the defendant, Shannon E. Putnam, in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Gaffney, wherein he was charged with violating an ordinance of the city, the pertinent part of which reads as follows: “Any person or persons creating any disturbing noises, or making, creating or engaging in any brawl, riot, affray; fighting or indulging in profane, obscene, abusive or vulgar language, * * * shall if found guilty, be subject to a fine * * *

There were two trials in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. State v. LangstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Morison v. Rawlinson, Chief of PoliceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. CoolerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The State of South Carolina v. James Edward MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  2. Mellen v. LaneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Nauful v. MilliganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. Silas v. BowenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  5. City of Beaufort v. RickenbakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API