Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Thiokol Corp. from the Board of Commissioners

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1982No. Appeal, No. 1600 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Thiokol Corporation appeals a Bucks County Common Pleas Court decision1 which dismissed a substan*27tive challenge to the Bristol Township Zoning Ordinance. We affirm.

Thiokol, owner of a 134-acre tract primarily zoned M-2-IIeavy Manufacturing,2 submitted a substantive challenge to the Zoning Ordinance and a proposed curative amendment in accordance with Sections 609.1 and 1104(1) (b) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, as amended, 53 P.S. §§10609.1, 11004(1) (b). After extensive hearings, the Bristol Township…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warwick Land Development Corp. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. G.M.P. Land Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API