United States v. Martin
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
DRIBBEN, Judge:
Appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of four specifications involving wrongful possession and sale of heroin, alleged as violations of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934.
Appellant challenges his conviction asserting that the offenses lacked “service connection” and thus, under the principle set forth in O’Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258, 89 S.Ct. 1683, 23 L.Ed.2d 291 (1969), the court-martial did not have jurisdiction to proceed. We disagree.
The record of trial reveals that on 3 September 1975, Private Thornhill, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HedlundUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- Edward J. Peterson v. Captain Warren Goodwin, Corrections Officer, United States Air Defense Center, Confinement Facility, Biggs Field, El Paso, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ShorteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984