Richardson v. State

CONCURRING OPINION TO OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

TEAGUE, Judge.

I authored the original unanimous per curiam panel opinion, reaching the same proper result as does the majority — that appellant’s appeal should be affirmed.1

I concluded, after reviewing the record, and still conclude, that appellant’s own admission during the hearing, that he unlawfully possessed a usable quantity of marijuana, was sufficient in itself to sustain the trial court’s order revoking appellant’s probation.

It is axiomatic under the law which governs revocation of probation cases that if a probationer,…