Simpson v. Rowan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Collateral estoppel generally bars a plaintiff from relitigating in a suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 an issue that was decided against him in earlier state proceedings. See Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); Donald v. Polk County, 836 F.2d 376, 381-82 (7th Cir.1988). The claim may proceed, however, if the plaintiff did not have a “full and fair opportunity” to litigate the issue in those earlier proceedings. See Allen, 449 U.S. at 95, 101 S.Ct. 411; Nowak v. St. Rita High School, 197 Ill.2d 381, 258 Ill. Dec. 782, 757 N.E.2d 471, 478 (2001). In this case,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nowak v. St. Rita High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Robert Simpson v. Tim RowanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christopher Lewis v. Dakota Demoss, et al.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2026
- Comer v. PayneDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- McGhee v. ShappardDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021
- Smith v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025