Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Rowan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 28, 2005No. 04-1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Collateral estoppel generally bars a plaintiff from relitigating in a suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 an issue that was decided against him in earlier state proceedings. See Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); Donald v. Polk County, 836 F.2d 376, 381-82 (7th Cir.1988). The claim may proceed, however, if the plaintiff did not have a “full and fair opportunity” to litigate the issue in those earlier proceedings. See Allen, 449 U.S. at 95, 101 S.Ct. 411; Nowak v. St. Rita High School, 197 Ill.2d 381, 258 Ill. Dec. 782, 757 N.E.2d 471, 478 (2001). In this case,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Nowak v. St. Rita High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Robert Simpson v. Tim RowanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Christopher Lewis v. Dakota Demoss, et al.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2026
  2. Comer v. PayneDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  3. McGhee v. ShappardDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Smith v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API