Billy Glen Isley v. Richard L. Dugger
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Chief Judge:
The appeal in this habeas corpus case raises the issue of whether statements made by criminal defendant Billy Glen Isley to two court-appointed psychiatrists were used by them in their determination of his sanity. Isley v. Wainwright, 792 F.2d 1516 (11th Cir.1986) (remanding to district court for evidentiary hearing). The district court decided the statements were necessary and usable so there was no constitutional error in allowing the psychiatrists to relate those statements to the jury during Isley’s Florida state trial. We affirm.
Isley was tried twice in state court on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Kenneth CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- State v. GoffOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. MorleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- State v. ManningOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.