In Re Estate of Torgersen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
In this will contest, appellant argues that the district court clearly erred in determining that appellant did not meet his burden of proving that decedent’s November 2002 will was the result of respondent’s undue influence and .did not meet his burden of proving that decedent lacked testamentary capacity. Appellant also challenges denial of his request for attorney fees under Minn.Stat. § 524.3-720 (2004).
FACTS
Following her husband’s death in 1971 until 2001, decedent Mary Torgersen lived in Indiana near one of her four daughters, EmCele Masbaum. Appellant Ned…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Matter of Estate of CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Matter of Estate of FlahertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Alleged Psychopathic Personality of JoelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re the Estate of LaueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re the Estate of BickelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re the ESTATE OF Esther Caroline SULLIVAN, DecedentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Estate of Castruccio v. CastruccioCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- In re the Estate of HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.