Kemp v. State

Sognier, Judge.

Armed robbery. Appellant contends in this appeal that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that three of the trial court’s charges were incorrect.

1. Appellant contends that his counsel made no motions for discovery or production of documents, and had he done so, certain photographs would have been discovered. Appellant also argues that his counsel, through cross-examination of a state witness, established appellant’s identification positively; that his attorney put appellant’s character in issue during closing argument by referring to appellant’s past confinement…