Legal Opinion

XMission LC v. Pure Health Research

District Court, D. Utah

Decided May 23, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00734Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION XMISSION, L.C., a Utah company, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO RECONSIDER, v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL, PUREHEALTH RESEARCH, a Virginia AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR business entity; and DOES 1–10, ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND BILL OF Defendants. COSTS Case No. 2:21-cv-734-TS District Judge Ted Stewart This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration Re Motion to Dismiss,1 Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Appeal,2 and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Shrader v. BiddingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Committee for the First Amendment v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API