Legal Opinion

United States v. Mendoza-Sifuentes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 4, 2005No. 04-40363Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

This court affirmed the conviction and sentence of Jose Mendoza-Sifuentes (Mendoza). United States v. Mendoza-Sifuentes, 115 Fed.Appx. 224 (5th Cir.2004) (unpublished). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See de la Cruz-Gonzalez v. United States, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 1995, — L.Ed.2d — (2005). This court requested and received supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of Booker.

In his supplemental letter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. BondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API