Legal Opinion

Watson v. Gillespie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This action was brought on an alleged account stated. At the close of plaintiff’s case a motion was made to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff’s proof did not show an account stated, which was denied. This motion was renewed at the close of the whole case and again denied. Upon the rendition of the verdict a motion was made to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, which was denied. To all of these denials exception was duly taken.

*615The question presented on this appeal is succinctly stated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Volkening v. . DegraafNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lavers v. HuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Brozan v. WormsNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Britton v. ScognamilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API