Legal Opinion

Moe v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 1, 2009No. A09A0565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

A Bartow County jury found Neil Moe guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of aggravated child molestation, OCGA § 16-6-4 (c); and three counts of child molestation, OCGA § 16-6-4 (a). Following the denial of his motion for a new trial, Moe appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and claiming that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. In challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, Moe contends that the testimony of the victim and of an eyewitness was inconclusive and contradictory. Moe also contends that the physical evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rankin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Felder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tiller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API