Legal Opinion

John O. Schofield, Inc. v. Nikkel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 12, 2000No. 5-98-0769PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins

The plaintiff, John O. Schofield, Inc. (Schofield), is Stephen Wilson’s assignee and successor in interest. Schofield claims that defendant Sam H. Nikkei orally agreed to convey to Wilson an interest in all oil and gas leases acquired in an area known as the Boulder Field Unit (Boulder Field) in exchange for Wilson’s geological services. Nikkei maintains that he agreed to convey to Wilson only an interest in the portion of Boulder Field known as lease A, the lease promoted by Nikkei.

Schofield appeals the trial court’s judgment denying its claim for specific performance of the oral agreement.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Housing Authority for La Salle County v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rodgers v. St. Mary's Hosp. of DecaturIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Messenger v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Newkirk v. BigardIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Trustmark Insurance Company v. General & Cologne Life Re of America, Formerly Known as Cologne Life Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Zahl v. KrupaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Enrique Olvera and Jeffrey Dawson v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Zic v. Italian Government Travel OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API