Legal Opinion
Hill v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided April 6, 2005No. 09-03-583 CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVE MeKEITHEN, Chief Justice.
Following a bench-trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of “Possession or Transport of Certain Chemicals With Intent to Manufacture Controlled Substance.” See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.124 (Vernon Supp.2003). 1 The trial court assessed punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Correctional Institutions Division for a term of ten years, with an added fine of $1,500. The trial court suspended imposition of the sentence and placed appellant on community supervision for a period of ten years. Appellant presents…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Poindexter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Conner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- MIHNOVICH v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
- $763.30 U. S. Currency and 2002 Ford F-250 Pickup (William Richard Holcombe) v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
- Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.