Legal Opinion

Howard v. MTA Metro-North Commuter Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 7, 2011No. 10 Civ. 3291(GWG)PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*199 OPINION & ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Wendell Howard, proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (“Title VII”), and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging that his former employer, MTA Metro-North Commuter Railroad, discriminated against him on the basis of his race and color. See Amended Complaint for Employment Discrimination, filed Oct. 28, 2010 (Docket # 14) (“Am. Compl.”). Following discovery, MTA Metro-North filed the instant motion for summary judgment.1…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Sethi v. NarodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. Ellis v. Century 21 Department StoresDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. St. Juste v. Metro Plus Health PlanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  4. Weber v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. Joseph v. Owens & Minor Distribution, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API