Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Burke

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1934No. 23600PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McXEILL. J.

The defendants in error, as plaintiffs, filed a petition in the district court of Oklahoma county in which they alleged that they were the owners of lots 31 and 32, block 16, Central addition to Oklahoma City, and s mght to quiet title against the defendants, C. E. Stout, T. B. Rucker, Bob Rucker, and Hall-Briscoe, Inc.

The defendant Bob Rucker filed an answer-equivalent to a disclaimer, and it appears from the pleadings and from the judgment of the court that the defendant I-Iall & Briscoe held an oil and gas lease on the property in question. No further men! ion need be made of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elerick v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morton v. OrsdolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Terwilleger v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Bramble v. CaywoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Ewart v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API