Rucker v. Burke
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
McXEILL. J.
The defendants in error, as plaintiffs, filed a petition in the district court of Oklahoma county in which they alleged that they were the owners of lots 31 and 32, block 16, Central addition to Oklahoma City, and s mght to quiet title against the defendants, C. E. Stout, T. B. Rucker, Bob Rucker, and Hall-Briscoe, Inc.
The defendant Bob Rucker filed an answer-equivalent to a disclaimer, and it appears from the pleadings and from the judgment of the court that the defendant I-Iall & Briscoe held an oil and gas lease on the property in question. No further men! ion need be made of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Elerick v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morton v. OrsdolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Terwilleger v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Bramble v. CaywoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Ewart v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.