Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 28, 1965No. 41167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The only matter cited by claimant in opposition to the employer’s argument is the dissenting opinion in Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Wilson, 72 Ga. App. 574, 582 (34 SE2d 634). The dissent cited has neither the effect of precedent nor, under the circumstances, persuasive import.

In Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Holloway, 58 Ga. App. 542, 545 (2) (199 SE 334), the claimant’s injury, by change of condition shown to the board, resulted in a 25 percent partial loss of the use of his foot. This court there stated: “It was proper for the board to make an award under the Code, §…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Home Accident Insurance v. McNairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. National Surety Corp. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crowe v. QUILTED TEXTILE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Purser v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API