Legal Opinion

New Rochelle Trust Co. v. Hinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClose, J.

The defendants have appealed from three orders denying their motions to dismiss the complaints of the plaintiffs for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaints are similar and may be summarized as actions brought by the obligees upon bonds secured by mortgages on real estate executed by the defendants’ testator some years before his death. In each action the amount sought to be recovered is the interest due and owing at the death of the obligor. The complaints contain no allegation as to the contents of the will nor is there any allegation that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Madole v. GavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jemzura v. JemzuraNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. City of Albany v. McMorranNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Decker v. People, New York County Courts1959
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. De Landa v. LucomCity of New York Municipal Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API