Charlotte Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Hartog
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Error to tbe Circuit Court of the United States for the Western. District of North Carolina. This was an action on account by Hartog & Fesel against the Charlotte Oil & Fertilizer Company. Defendant filed a counterclaim. Judgment was rendered for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BRAWLEY, District Judge.
The defendants in error, who were plaintiffs below, were commission merchants at Rotterdam, in the kingdom of the Netherlands, and this controversy grows out of sundry shipments of cotton-seed meal and cotton-seed oil made by the plaintiff in error, the defendant below, a corporation, doing business at Charlotte, N. O. The first shipment was of oil, account sales of which were sent on January 28, 1893, subsequently closed by draft, and does not enter into this controversy. The second shipment was of 1,700 tons of cotton-seed meal, originally consigned to Eiizen & Co.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Lockwood v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Oil Co. v. Van EttenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Montgomery v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Williams v. Casparis Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Gadsden County Tobacco Co. v. CorrySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Malcomson v. Wappoo MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1900
- Buckeye Brewing Co. v. EymerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910