Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Mullen

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 12, 1954No. 6773-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover 100 shares of stock of the defendant bank, 178 shares of stock of the B. M. Behrends Co., and a deed to certain lands in California which he alleges are wrongfully withheld by the defendant Mullen; or damages for conversion thereof and of the dividends and income therefrom, or an accounting. The controversy was held to be equitable in nature, D.C., 14 F.R.D. 142, and dealt with accordingly.

The plaintiff is the son of the defendant Mullen. He contends that the stock and the interest in the land were given him by his mother and that his title…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chapple's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Innes v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Buhl v. KavanaghCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  5. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API