Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hayes v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2005No. 2003-SC-0675-MR, 2003-SC-0717-MRPublished

1Dissent

Dissenting opinion by

Justice ROACH.

After noting that the evidence against Hayes was “overwhelming” and rejecting all of his claims of error save one relating to voir dire, the majority opinion, in a conclusory fashion, proclaims the voir dire error is not subject to harmless error. Because the majority opinion relies on inapplicable cases and refuses to consider harmless error, I dissent.

I. HAYES’S ALLEGATION OF ERROR

Let us begin with what actually occurred at trial. No prospective juror indicated that he or she would hold the fact that Hayes did not testify against him. Significantly, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API