Redsecker v. Wade
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah.: George N. Davis, Judge. This is an action by F. H. Redsecker against N. J. Wade, in which plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals. Respondent now moves to strike from the files appellant’s bill of exceptions. Department 1. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Justice Ramsey. This is an action to recover money alleged to be due upon a promissory note and upon certain accounts. The defendant set up several counterclaims.
Read the full summary
From Multnomah.: George N. Davis, Judge. This is an action by F. H. Redsecker against N. J. Wade, in which plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals. Respondent now moves to strike from the files appellant’s bill of exceptions. Department 1. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Justice Ramsey. This is an action to recover money alleged to be due upon a promissory note and upon certain accounts. The defendant set up several counterclaims. There was a verdict and a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,825. The defendant appeals. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion
Decided February 3, 1914.
On the Merits.
(138 Pac. 485.)
2Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey
There are three counts in the complaint. The first is based upon a promissory note for $2,000, and interest thereon at 6 per cent per annum, from January 31, 1911, and $300 as attorney’s fees. In the second count, the plaintiff asks to recover $80 as money loaned, and interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from November 7, 1912. In the third count the plaintiff demands $180 for six months’ work and labor.
The defendant answered, admitting all of the first count, excepting the claim for $300 as attorney’s fees. The answer…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Real v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- State v. BaconOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. ReynerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Herbert v. DufurOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Koch v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.