Legal Opinion

Holmes Trust

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1958No. Appeals, 65 and 66PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The decree from which these appeals were taken is affirmed, at the appellant’s costs, on the following-opinion of President Judge Taxis of the Orphans’ Court of Montgomery County.

“The present controversy was initiated by petition to remove the co-trustee in two trusts. One of the pe-tioners, Lewis A. Holmes, is the settlor and co-trustee of both of these inter vivos trusts. Helen H. Hallock and Katharine C. Holmes, the other two petitioners, hold beneficial interests therein. On October 26, 1956, citations were issued directing Frederick L. Raker to show cause Why he should…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Scientific Living, Inc. v. HohenseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. In Re Estate & Testamentary Trust of HamillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. In Re Estate of CroessantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Clarke & Cohen v. Family & Industrial Medical Facilities, Inc. (In Re Family & Industrial Medical Facilities, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API