Legal Opinion

Burris v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 2015No. COA15–312PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETZ, Judge.

*392Petitioner Maurice Burris was involved in a car accident on 5 March 2013. Emergency personnel removed him from the driver's side of his car and placed him on a stretcher. A law enforcement officer noticed a strong odor of alcohol on Burris's breath. When the officer asked Burris how much he had to drink, Burris responded, "quite a bit." The officer later charged Burris with the implied-consent offense of driving while impaired.

Burris ultimately refused the officer's request to submit to a voluntary blood draw at the hospital after being informed of his implied-consent rights and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Mathis v. North Carolina Division of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Steinkrause v. TatumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Johnson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Hartman v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cook v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. St. John v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API