Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Day

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1985No. Appeal, No. 859 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion' by

Senior Judge Kalish,

The Department of Transportation (DOT) appeals a common pleas court decision sustaining the appeal of the motorist whose operating privileges were suspended because he refused to take a blood-alcohol examination. The trial court found that the driver did not comprehend what w,as occurring as a result of an accident and, consequently, did not. make a conscious and knowing refusal. We affirm.

DOT contends that no medical evidence was introduced to establish that the appellee’s injuries rendered him incapable of making a knowing and conscious refusal. Where* the ■…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waigand v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. In Re Appeal From Suspension of Operating Privileges of CapozzoliCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. HanesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Bureau of Traffic Safety v. DauerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Spirer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. HooverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. GarlanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. GroscostCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Carlin v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Ostermeyer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API