Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Day
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion' by
Senior Judge Kalish,
The Department of Transportation (DOT) appeals a common pleas court decision sustaining the appeal of the motorist whose operating privileges were suspended because he refused to take a blood-alcohol examination. The trial court found that the driver did not comprehend what w,as occurring as a result of an accident and, consequently, did not. make a conscious and knowing refusal. We affirm.
DOT contends that no medical evidence was introduced to establish that the appellee’s injuries rendered him incapable of making a knowing and conscious refusal. Where* the ■…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waigand v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- In Re Appeal From Suspension of Operating Privileges of CapozzoliCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. HanesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Bureau of Traffic Safety v. DauerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Spirer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by29 opinions
- COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. HooverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. GarlanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. GroscostCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Carlin v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ostermeyer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.