Legal Opinion

Haynie v. Foremost Dairies Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1936No. 25682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Except in case of railroad companies, the master shall not be liable to one servant for injuries arising from the negligence or misconduct of other servants about the same business.” Code, § 66-304. The term “vice-principal,” as used in the fellow-servant law, includes any servant who represents the master in the discharge of those personal or absolute duties which every master owes to his servants; such duties being often referred to as the non-assignable duties of a master. Among those duties of the master are, providing machinery and appliances, the place to work, the inspection and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Whiters v. Mallory Steamship Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Studevant v. Blue Springs Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Standard Cotton Mills v. CollumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Wallace v. Kimball Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Hulsey v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Clance v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API