Kaminski v. Schefer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Esther Kaminski, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 20th day of January, 1899, upon the verdict of a jury, rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the Jth day of February, 1899,denying the plaintiff’s motion for anew trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
On the 8th of July, 1891, Henry M. Kaminski, the husband of the plaintiff, entered into a contract with the defendants to take effect on the first of the following January, which, among other things, provided that the business theretofore carried on by Kaminski — a wholesale millinery business — should, on and after that date, *171be transacted by the defendants’ firm, Schefer, Schramm & Yogel; that the defendants should take, at the market price, the goods which Kaminski then had on hand and allot to him a space in their store for the sale of his goods; should advance the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Taft v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- King v. . Van VleckNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Larbig v. PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Starin v. FondaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Starin v. FondaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905