Legal Opinion

Russell v. Berkstresser

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Cass Circuit Court. — Hon. Noah M. Givan,, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Winslow, C.

This is an action on three promissory notes executed by defendant to plaintiff, each for $450, all bearing the same date, -but payable at different dates, with compound interest at ten per cent, with a credit indorsed on the one first maturing of .$168.

The answer, after a general denial, and the statement that the notes were executed solely in consideration of the purchase money of certain land, states : “ That on the 29th day of July, 1878, the date of said notes, plaintiff executed to defendant a conveyance of said real estate, whereby the said plaintiff covenanted with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. Whetstone v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. State v. DaubertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  4. Pratt v. MorrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  5. Martin v. SmyleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ReadingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Sinnamon v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Walthers v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Tucker v. DolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railway Co. v. NorthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API