People v. Dioquardo
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The information charges a violation of section 722 of the Penal Law by name although not by section number. There is no requirement that the section number be mentioned. Indeed, the presence of the number is unnecessary and surplusage. (People v. Adler, 174 App. Div. 301, 303; see, also, People v. Dwyer, 160 App. Div. 542, 547, affd. 215 N. Y. 46.) The information also sets forth, with sufficient certainty and particularity, the act constituting that offense, which the defendant concedes to be disorderly conduct. It was sufficient to justify *516the issuance of a warrant of arrest. Thus, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- People v. AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- People v. DwyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fanale v. SheehyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- People v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- People v. ColdironYonkers City Court · 1974
- Fanale v. SheehyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- People v. Gilinsky, New York County Courts1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.