Legal Opinion

Zeigler v. Carter (Ex Parte Carter)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 27, 2018No. 1160887; 1160897Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judge James H. Anderson, Montgomery, as respondent.

MENDHEIM, Justice.

CGI Technologies and Solutions, Inc. ("CGI"), and Clinton Carter, in his capacity as Director of the Alabama Department of Finance, separately petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Montgomery Circuit Court to dismiss, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, an action filed by Jim Zeigler1 challenging a contract between CGI and the State of Alabama on the basis that the contract violated Alabama's competitive-bid law. We grant the petitions and issue the writs.

I. Facts

On September 30, 1982, the State of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Ex Parte Flint ConstructionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Ex Parte ZiglarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API