Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. Kaplansky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1935No. Docket Nos. 36, 37, Calendar Nos. 37,914, 37,915Published

1DissentPotter, J.

The questions involved in these cases are identical. They were briefed and heard together.

The facts stated in detail are those involved in Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co. v. Caldwell, Administratrix, and others.

May 8, 1934, the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company filed a bill for an injunction restraining defendants, their agents, attorneys, counsellors, servants and employees, and each of them, by prosecuting an action for damages against plaintiff in the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Michigan, northern division; from testifying in said cause; giving any…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Central National Bank v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Buchanan v. BilgerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Greenvault v. President of the Farmers & Mechanics' BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1847

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API