Legal Opinion

Rice v. Sayers

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 3, 1951No. 6488Published

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOTT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, who are nieces, nephews or descendants of deceased nieces and nephews of Augustus J. Rice, commonly known as A. J. Rice, seek to impress a resulting trust in their favor upon the assets now held by the defendant trustees under testamentary trusts. The beneficiaries under the several trusts, duly made parties herein, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rules 20 and 24, 28 U.S.C.A., have answered and join with the defendants in asserting that the trusts are valid and should be upheld.

After a somewhat lengthy trial, during which numerous exhibits were received in evidence, all…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Egnatic ex rel. Egnatic v. WollardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Yeager v. YeagerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Miami County Nat. Bank of Paola, Kan. v. BancroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API