Legal Opinion

Weller v. Hanaur

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On Demurrer by Defendant Independence National Bank.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Oircuit Judge.

The statement' of plaintiffs’ claim sets forth:

That the plaintiffs, J. H. Weller and Robert T. Weller, a.re now, and at the time of the bringing of this suit and the accruing of the cause of action were, citizens and residents, the one of the territory of Oklahoma, and the other of the state of Missouri. That theretofore they were engaged in a general merchandise business in Garfield county (formerly O county), in the territory of Oklahoma. The defendants Hanaur, Kohn & Co. were, and are still, engaged in general merchandise business in the city of Philadelphia. “Upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Herring v. . HoppockNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Dyett v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Davis v. Newkirk, Barker & YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Ford & Rockwood v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davies v. Texas Central R. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Lancaster Bone Fertilizer Co. v. Weaver, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API