Legal Opinion

Oceguera v. Labor Commission

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 29, 2020No. 20190367-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2020 UT App 83

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MARTHA OCEGUERA, Petitioner, v. LABOR COMMISSION AND THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP, Respondents. Opinion No. 20190367-CA Filed May 29, 2020 Original Proceeding in this Court Loren M. Lambert, Attorney for Petitioner Lori L. Hansen and Cody G. Kesler, Attorneys for Respondent The Corporation of the Presiding Bishop JUDGE RYAN M. HARRIS authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES GREGORY K. ORME and MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER concurred. HARRIS, Judge: ¶1 Martha Oceguera injured her knee while working as a seamstress for The Corporation of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Murray v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Nyrehn v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Ortega v. Ridgewood Estates LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. Acosta v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. Watson v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API