Legal Opinion

Cassell v. Lowry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1904No. 20,419PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Benton Circuit Court; Joseph M. Rabb, Judga Action by Abram Lowry against Horace G. Cassell. Erom a decree for plaintiff on his complaint and against defendant on his cross-complaint, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Lowry, the appellee, brought this action to quiet his title to two lots in the town of Boswell, alleging that he was the owner in fee, and that the defendant claimed an adverse interest therein, which claim was unfounded and a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title. Cassell, the appellant, in addition to the general denial, in substance answered that on October 5, 1889, he conveyed by warranty deed to the plaintiff the identical real estate described in the complaint; that at the time of the conveyance the plaintiff paid all the purchase price except $100, for which he executed to the defendant his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Holmes v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gage v. Riverside Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1898
  5. Lilly v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Tracy v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Miller v. Jackson TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Company and Continental Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  5. Terry v. DavenportIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API