Sacramento Baseball Club, Inc. v. Great Northern Baseball Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Plaintiff sued the guarantors of a contract for delinquent sums owed under the contract. The trial court held that the two documents used by the parties were two contracts and that the second lacked sufficient consideration and therefore could not be enforced. We reverse.
The parties submitted the case to the trial court on stipulated facts. Defendant Great Northern Baseball Company (Great Northern) agreed to buy a baseball franchise from plaintiff Sacramento Baseball Club, Inc. (Sacramento Baseball). Defendants Bain and Job acted as guarantors of the transaction. Subsequent to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Prince v. Western Empire Life Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Land Reclamation, Inc. v. Riverside CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by16 opinions
- Estate Landscape & Snow Removal Specialists, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Bellon v. MalnarUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Vali Convalescent & Care Institutions v. Division of Health Care FinancingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Knight v. PostCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Wagner v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.