Legal Opinion

Seifried v. Bash

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1938No. 28011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff in error, defendant below, from a verdict and judgment rendered in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county. The parties hereafter will he referred to as in the trial court.

The action was begun by plaintiff filing his petition, containing four causes of action: First, for $84 damages for wrongfully pasturing plaintiff’s land, $255 for wrongfully excluding plaintiff from use of a pond upon his premises, and for $30 for wrongfully removing a fence from plaintiff’s land. The second cause of action was for damages for removal of trees and dirt from plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bucktrot v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. McMaster v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Aaronson v. PeytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Mayer v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stiers v. MayhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API