Legal Opinion

Centeno v. Inselmann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1975No. 15429PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel respondent, Jake Inselmann, City Clerk of San Antonio, to accept and file the application of relator, Eloy Centeno, to have his name placed on the ballot for Place 9 of the City Council of the City of San Antonio.

On February 28, 1975, relator tendered his application to the respondent. The respondent refused to file the application on *890the ground that relator is now a Trustee of the City Public Service Board of the City of San Antonio and is prohibited under Article XVI, Section 40 of the Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St., from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willis v. PottsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Pruitt v. Glen Rose Independent School District Number OneTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. BrinkerhoffTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hall v. BaumTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Whitehead v. JulianTexas Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. De Alejandro v. Hunter, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  2. Lowther v. FernandezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. De Alejandro v. Hunter, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1985
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API