Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 2007No. 06-CA-111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Adam Smith, appeals from his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to one count of third-degree robbery.

{¶ 2} As his sole assignment of error, Smith contends:

{¶ 3} “The trial court abused its discretion by sentencing appellant to the maximum term of incarceration.”

{¶ 4} The record reflects that Adam was charged with two counts of aggravated robbery and one count of complicity to commit felonious assault in the Juvenile Division of the Common Pleas Court of Clark County. Adam entered a plea of not guilty. The state moved to have Smith prosecuted as an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. O'DellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LoweryOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. Smith, 08-Ca-37 (3-6-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API